End terror or no aid, US threatens Pakistan

Pakistan's bottomfeeding on American aid is about to end unless it terminates its policy of covertly using terrorism to further its frontiers, the Obama administration has conveyed to Islamabad, amid indications that the US is also making Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif 's proposed visit to Washington conditional to meeting this objective.


A key administration official on Thursday said there has been no announcement about a Sharif visit to Washington in October although the trip had been widely reported in the Pakistani media based on briefings from diplomats in Islamabad. “This is news to me. We have not made any statements about that (Sharif 's visit to Washington),“ Peter Lavoy , special assistant to US President and senior director for South Asian Affairs at the National Security Council of the White House told PTI.

The rethink -or at least holding back the announcement -of the visit comes after the administration conveyed to Islamabad that it will not certify the effectiveness of Pakistan counterterrorism operation to Congress to enable passage of the Coalition Support Fund (CSF), the military reimbursement aid that goes towards keeping Pakistan solvent.
As part of its rentier-state ethos, Pakistan provides logistical support to US and Coali tion forces in Afghanistan and in turn bills Washington for reimbursement. Pakistan has extracted more than $13 billion from the US since the coalition forces swooped into Afghanistan. The CSF was scheduled to end following the US drawdown from Afghanistan in December 2014, but the Obama government extended the programme for another year through a legislation containing additional conditions, including a requirement for certification by the defence secretary that Pakistani military operations are rolling up terrorist networks, including the Haqqani group in North Waziristan.

But true to form, Pakistan's military-intelligence establishment has again suckered Washington fooling the US by keeping the death from illnesses of Taliban supremo Mullah Omar and Jalalludin Haqqani while trying to manage their succession.

The manipulation, coming after Osama bin Laden being sheltered in Abbottabad, has further eroded trust in a country with a long history of lying and dissembling. Although US policy of forbearance is centered around its fear of Pakistan's collapse, that tolerance is being tested in the face of the Pakistani military-intelligence's serial malfeasance, including its continued patronage of terrorists associated with the 2611 Mumbai attack in which six Americans died.

“The US move is politically more damaging for Islamabad than its financial impact, which is significant nevertheless for being an important source for narrowing the current account deficit.

More importantly , it coincided with the deterioration in ties with Afghanistan because of Kabul's allegations that Islamabad continued to harbor Taliban bases from where attacks were being launched,“ Karachi's Dawn daily , which first reported the rupture, said on Thursday .
“The US decision is also likely to sour ties in the run-up to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif 's scheduled visit to White House in October,“ it added. Pakistan's economy is both parlous and perilously-poised, despite frequent juggling of numbers in a country that does not even conduct a regular census. Even aid is starting to dwindle after its familiar patrons in the Gulf have pulled the plug and its sugar daddy China has not come through with the expected bail-outs.

Desperate to keep the US pipeline open, the Pakistani military , which runs the coun try's foreign policy on behalf of the nominal civilian government, has been decimating its civilian population with everyday air-strikes this week in North Waziristan, announcing dozens of dead “militants“ which no one is able to authenticate due to lack of access. But the country's continued patronage of terrorists on its eastern flank with India, including its protection of UN designated terrorists such as Hafiz Saeed and Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi indicates there has been no fundamental change in its policy .

With Pakistan's salience to American objectives declining in the context of US outreach to Iran and the drawdown in Afghanistan, some scholars are now pressing for a review of Washington's ties with Islamabad. In a Foreign Affairs magazine piece headlined “An Unworthy Ally ,“ C Christine Fair and Sumit Ganguly have argued that the time has come for Washington to “cut Pakistan loose,“ going as far as to suggest punitive sanctions against Pakistani elite, including visa denials to its top generals and officials who support terrorism.


source:TOI
Share on Google Plus

About Unknown

This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment

/**/